Abstract
This article critically evaluates Gerd Lüdemann’s historical methodology in his study of the resurrection of Jesus. Situating Lüdemann’s work within the broader context of the quests for the historical Jesus, this paper identifies both its methodological strengths and its limitations, particularly its reliance on a strictly historical-critical approach. It argues that a more integrative methodology—drawing from developments in the third quest—would yield a more balanced and credible interpretation of the resurrection accounts.
Recommended Citation
Novabos, Kelvin Ruel G.
(2024)
"A Review of Gerd Lüdemann’s Methodology in “The Resurrection of Christ: A Historical Inquiry”,"
Loyola Papers: Vol. 5:
No.
1, Article 8.
Available at:
https://archium.ateneo.edu/loyola/vol5/iss1/8