‘Mixed blessings’: parental religiousness, parenting, and child adjustment in global perspective

Marc H. Bornstein, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Diane L. Putnick, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Jennifer E. Lansford, Duke University
Suha M. Al-Hassan, Hashemite University
Dario Bacchini, Second University of Naples
Anna Silvia Bombi
Lei Chang
Kirby Deater-Deckard
Laura Di Giunta, University of Rome La Sapienza
Kenneth A. Dodge, Duke University
Patrick S. Malone, University of South Carolina
Paul Oburu, Maseno University
Concetta Pastorelli, University of Rome La Sapienza
Ann T. Skinner, Duke University
Emma Sorbring
Laurence Steinberg
Sombat Tapanya, Chiang Mai University
Liliana Maria Uribe Tirado, Universidad San Buenaventura
Arnaldo Zelli, University of Rome
Liane Peña Alampay, Ateneo de Manila University

Abstract

Background

Most studies of the effects of parental religiousness on parenting and child development focus on a particular religion or cultural group, which limits generalizations that can be made about the effects of parental religiousness on family life.

Methods

We assessed the associations among parental religiousness, parenting, and children's adjustment in a 3‐year longitudinal investigation of 1,198 families from nine countries. We included four religions (Catholicism, Protestantism, Buddhism, and Islam) plus unaffiliated parents, two positive (efficacy and warmth) and two negative (control and rejection) parenting practices, and two positive (social competence and school performance) and two negative (internalizing and externalizing) child outcomes. Parents and children were informants.

Results

Greater parent religiousness had both positive and negative associations with parenting and child adjustment. Greater parent religiousness when children were age 8 was associated with higher parental efficacy at age 9 and, in turn, children's better social competence and school performance and fewer child internalizing and externalizing problems at age 10. However, greater parent religiousness at age 8 was also associated with more parental control at age 9, which in turn was associated with more child internalizing and externalizing problems at age 10. Parental warmth and rejection had inconsistent relations with parental religiousness and child outcomes depending on the informant. With a few exceptions, similar patterns of results held for all four religions and the unaffiliated, nine sites, mothers and fathers, girls and boys, and controlling for demographic covariates.

Conclusions

Parents and children agree that parental religiousness is associated with more controlling parenting and, in turn, increased child problem behaviors. However, children see religiousness as related to parental rejection, whereas parents see religiousness as related to parental efficacy and warmth, which have different associations with child functioning. Studying both parent and child views of religiousness and parenting are important to understand the effects of parental religiousness on parents and children.