Abstract
This paper offers a platform for a mutually critical imaginary dialogue between two different anti-Eurocentric analytic approaches, Postcolonialism (PC) and Pantayong Pananaw (From-Us, For-Us Perspective, PP). The dialogue foregrounds key areas of engagement between these approaches and allows in the process to revisit a number of vexing issues that interrogate them as well as the nature of an engaged, pro-marginalized scholarship. It suggests that while each approach can profitability learn from the other, it seems that a truly progressive aspiration may be better served by going beyond the current orientations or foci of the two approaches.
Recommended Citation
Curaming, Rommel A.
(2016)
"Postcolonial Studies and Pantayong Pananaw in Philippine Historiography,"
Kritika Kultura:
No.
27, Article 6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13185/1656-152x.2091
Available at:
https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss27/6
