Ageing and Stateless: Non-decisionism and State Violence across Temporal and Geopolitical Space from Bhutan to the United States

Document Type


Publication Date



State violence encompasses the actions states choose to take or choose not to take. Non-decisionism; which is decisionism’s philosophical reverse; is the idea that not only action and judgment cause state violence; but; at times; state failure to act and decide. In this chapter; building on previous and current work; the case of older Bhutanese refugees who were denationalized and resettled in the United States is interrogated as a limit case to the promise of durable solution for refugee statelessness. While resettlement with a route to citizenship is a conventional durable solution for stateless refugees; not all refugees are capable; much less are they permitted; to integrate into the fabric of citizenship. There is no viable path to citizenship for them. This chapter explores how the old; frequently illiterate refugees stuck in their places of resettlement find themselves in a state of permanent non-citizenship. State non-decisionism in the grant or withholding of citizenship; by U.S. citizenship law and international and domestic refugee law and policy; leaves them stateless. Resettled-yet-stateless; they surrender entitlement to all of the essential benefits of citizenship and to citizenship itself. By arguing the relation of state violence across temporal and spatial distances; this chapter extends correlations of non-decisionism. From the exclusionary decision-making behavior of the Bhutanese state some 30 years ago to the non-decisionism of the American state; state non-decisionism is presented not as an anomaly but a rule and its existence across time and national boundaries should be acknowledged and realized in our post-modern age.